D359 Rochester vs. Williams Backs Survey

I'd like to get a sense of which D359 back appears more frequently in our collections. We tried this thread over the summer but I was hoping we might get a few more responses this time around.

People have mentioned in the past that the Rochester Baking back is slightly tougher than Williams, but what I've observed leads me to believe that the opposite might be the case.

I have three D359's in my collection, all Rochester backs:



Let's see/hear about yours

I have a davis...williams baking...and a strunk...rochester...the strunk seems to show up everywhere!

pete ullman

ullmandds wrote:I have a davis...williams baking...and a strunk...rochester...the strunk seems to show up everywhere!

pee ullman

Thank you Pee!

I agree that Strunk appears to be among the most common cards in the set.

So far we have:

4 Rochester
1 Williams

I only have one of each:

Rochester - Livingston
Williams - Lord

While on the A's World Champions "set", how does the E104-1 Nadja back rank vs. Rochester/Williams?

All the D359's I've owned were Rochester backs (the Strunk is the only one I still own). It may be a little misleading though as all of them came from the group in REA