Opinions on this T206 Cycle back

I recently picked up this Overall Cycle back with the assumption that it is a 460 back. This was/is one of the 11 possible 460 backs I did not have confirmation of. Am I just hoping or is my assumption that the number in the dark part of the tape a part of a "6".

All opinions are welcome.



Happy Holidays,

Lee

Simple solution, compare it to one with a complete back and see how it matches up. I'd tell ya to do a scan overlay, but I know you aren't tech savvy enough to do that, so eyeball it.

Jay

The piece of tape with the number on it appears to have been moved at some time so an overlay would not be a solution.

Lee

I could be wrong, but I don't think that Overall comes with a Cycle 350 back.

Hi Steve, from the data I was looking at it is suppose to come in both 350 & 460. Here should be a better scan:



Lee

It's a 350/460 card, but the spreadsheet I have shows it without a couple of 350 backs. I think the Super Set sheet, on which I based mine, is the same way. Not saying that a Cycle 350 doesn't exist, but looking at the blown-up scan, I'd say it's a definite 460. Which is good for you.

Steve, I think you brought up a good question. It appears that this card does not come in the Cycle 350, this puzzles me.

Lee

Lee, I went back to check Scot Reader's e-book on the Monster and only the super-prints of the 350/460 series have Cycle and Broadleaf 350 backs. I think non-supers are missing a few other back types that aren't designated with the series. Carolina Brights and maybe another. If you don't have the PDF file, I can e-mail it to you.

Thanks Steve,

I actually have been rereading Scott literature, it has been a couple of years.

Lee