ID HELP Pete Rose card
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Re: ID HELP Pete Rose card
That card is in the style of globe imports. Not sure if that is what it is. They are small, blank backed, crudely printed, and, as I recall, on cheap paper.
m-mac- All Star
- Posts : 148
Trader Points :
Re: ID HELP Pete Rose card
That describes the card pretty well. Were they factory cut?
Lee
Lee
bowlingshoeguy- Sultan of the Cycle Back
- Posts : 3106
Trader Points :
Re: ID HELP Pete Rose card
1969 Globe Imports - Very common and very cheap
Playing card set, 52 + Joker. SCD lists the Rose at $6 in NM. Mantle is the most expensive in the set at $40.
This set has also been reprinted for some odd reason.
Playing card set, 52 + Joker. SCD lists the Rose at $6 in NM. Mantle is the most expensive in the set at $40.
This set has also been reprinted for some odd reason.
Z-NUT- MVP
- Posts : 476
Trader Points :
Re: ID HELP Pete Rose card
Thanks for the excellant info.
Lee
Lee
bowlingshoeguy- Sultan of the Cycle Back
- Posts : 3106
Trader Points :
Re: ID HELP Pete Rose card
They are so cheap, that they would be easy to reprint and hand cut, I guess. The ones I purchased in the mid-1980s were sold in a deck. Not sure if the deck was 52, plus a joker, or slightly more, but I think we paid maybe $2 or so. The thing I recall, in addition to the law quality of the print, is that the paper was really cheap. I don't remember how sharp or exact the cut was, but I do not recall thinking that they were hand cut. But the paper, it was so cheap, I wondered if they bought it from a developing country, or if they used leftover surplus construction paper from my 1st grade class.
Your card looks about right to me - tanned paper with wear on the edges and tips. A diagonal of the photo relative to the edges seems about right to me, too. But someone else has, no doubt, handled way more of these and has a better memory and knowledge than me.
They were so low quality, and so crude, I was not concerned that they were reprints. For a deck of 52 or so, it seemed like a lot of work for only $2, even for 1984 or so.
Your card looks about right to me - tanned paper with wear on the edges and tips. A diagonal of the photo relative to the edges seems about right to me, too. But someone else has, no doubt, handled way more of these and has a better memory and knowledge than me.
They were so low quality, and so crude, I was not concerned that they were reprints. For a deck of 52 or so, it seemed like a lot of work for only $2, even for 1984 or so.
m-mac- All Star
- Posts : 148
Trader Points :

» this is bizarrre...pete rose removed from bb card history!!!
» Pete Rose article...huh?
» Pete Rose corked bat
» Welcome Pete Calderon
» So, Pete Browning is on first.
» Pete Rose article...huh?
» Pete Rose corked bat
» Welcome Pete Calderon
» So, Pete Browning is on first.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|