Vintage Card Match

I'm guessing Jay's Oakes is a E92 Nadja....legit set match...

I did forget that Dockman and this Nadja were both E92s but I can't remember if the Oakes is a Dockman. You knew the card was going to show up at one time or another.

Lee

it should be, he's only shown that card off for 8 years! if jay can work in the thorpe and colgan speaker it's time to close this thread up.

It is a Nadja. I was hoping someone would post an m101-4/5 in the transition. Still time since Evers and others are in t-cards and that set.

Nope...going in a different direction here...[img][/img]

Onward-

bowlingshoeguy wrote:I did forget that Dockman and this Nadja were both E92s but I can't remember if the Oakes is a Dockman. You knew the card was going to show up at one time or another.

Lee

As a side note, Oakes is one of the E92 subjects that is not part of the smaller Dockman set of 40.

Pete, wrong Nadjas, or are we going with a general e92?

YOU TALKING TO ME, JAY? I WAS MATCHING THE CROFTS HONUS?! THAT'S AN E90-2.

E107 Wagner used to be shown here.

Nothing to see here.

ullmandds wrote:YOU TALKING TO ME, JAY? I WAS MATCHING THE CROFTS HONUS?! THAT'S AN E90-2.

Depends if we are counting all e92 backs the same or as separate sets. If so, the Wagner is no good if we are doing separate sets. We would need an Oakes or an e92 Nadja. Lee is the one that brought it up saying that the Oakes was no good if it wasn't a Nadja.

E107 Kelley used to be shown here

Well then Lee should be kicked out of the game!!!! If your Oakes is a nadja...then the last few moves are invalid...and should be deleted...in my opinion...to be faithful to the rules.

not sure what the big deal is... it's just something to keep us occupied with cards. Nonetheless, I deleted my two.

Brian...that's pretty funny!

OK then...

Oakes it is...

Yawn...

ullmandds wrote:Yawn...

and to match it...