Card HOF, new voting

I'm changing the way this is done. I have start a separate thread for each card. This will make figuring out the 75% easy. Voting will be open until the end of the month and then another group or 4 or 5 cards will be put up for voting.

There is no need to post that you have voted since figuring out the 75 percent is very easy.

Jay

i'm just proud of the fact i'm part of the voting committee

sabrjay wrote:There is no need to post that you have voted since figuring out the 75 percent is very easy.

Jay

In a previous post (on another thread) someone had mentioned whether we should do the 75% to get acceptance into the HOF. Is that set in stone? Or are you considering taking the highest percentages if you don't get any that have 75% (hypothetically)?

I like the idea of 75% cutoff. I figure if 3/4 of the people voting don't think it's worthy then it probably shouldn't go in. I'm also considering a one and done for voting unless someone can show good reason why a card should be voted on again.

Jay

From the initial list, in a little over a day of voting, it only looks like 1 of the current choices even has a chance of getting 75%.

Of course I know things can change, but this will be interesting....

It suprises me a bit too. Especially the n162 Kelley. I like that card better than the Anson.

Jay

sabrjay wrote:It suprises me a bit too. Especially the n162 Kelley. I like that card better than the Anson.

Jay

Same here.....I also like the Kelley better then the Anson

the kelly pic IS better than anson imo...it's just a popularity contest anyways . i do like the strictness/selectivity of the voters!

cccc wrote: i do like the strictness/selectivity of the voters!

True....

I bet if we went back and redid the old inductees.......a majority of those may not get in.

I think the one thread is better for voting, it is a pain to go throuhg each thread to vote. All you need to do is to have a automatic yes to to count total votes. I think we will get much more participation.

Lee