Love this website but...

Should it be updated to reflect changes. I have had this site bookmarked for a few years now and i check it out once in a while. I am sure everyone reading this has also been to it.

It helped me out tremendously when i was first getting in to E card collecting. I am no expert in the e card field but i think maybe only a few changes should be made.

http://www.caramel-cards.com/cards.html


Mark

I was very happy to find Pete's site years ago and spent many hours pouring over the info and the images. When all the gallery pages stopped loading, I stopped checking it out all together. I would love it if he had the time to update it and get the images back up. I have, however, checked it for his listings of scarcity on certain cards within a set. If those need to be updated, I wouldn't know, but I would certainly like it if they were so that I get good info when I do reference his lists.

It's still a great site to point beginners to when they are interested in caramels.

AndyH

Pete's site does not get updated.
It is the card's job to comform to his tabulations.
And they usually do. But some seem to go astray for a while.
When actually we just counted wrong, or too soon.

I think Peter Calderon's site sparked a lot of collectors' interest in e cards, and I'd even say it played a significant role in the surge we've seen these cards make over the past 6-7 years. While Pete has moved on and no longer maintains this website, it still contains a whole lot of valuable information for those just getting into e cards. The rankings and scarcity charts were particularly well done.

It helped me out tremendously when i was first getting in to E card collecting. I am no expert in the e card field but i think maybe only a few changes should be made.

What changes in particular would you make Mark? Perhaps if the e card collectors on this forum put their heads together and pointed out some needed edits, Pete might still be willing to update his site to make it current. I know Tony A. for one would likely have some suggestions for the e90-1 section.

He states E97 are "Extremely difficult". I think they should be put in the difficult cat. and E106 should move up to very difficult. Of course thats just my opinion.


Markfficult

I went ahead and took a peek at the E90-1 section of the website. Although the set is described very well
it could stand to be updated just a bit. It's still a terrific site though and a great reference for anyone needing
information on "E" sets.

Tony