More evidence against Clemens

View previous topic View next topic Go down

More evidence against Clemens

Post by sabrjay on Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:20 am

Looks like they've got the smoking gun on Clemens and PEDs that they have never been able to get against Bonds. For some reason, I doubt we'll hear too much about this either.

Clemens article

Jay
Growing old is not optional. Growing up is.

sabrjay
Dunderhead
Dunderhead

Posts : 1273
Joined : 15 Dec 2007
Age : 45
Trader Points : 
14/10014/10014/10014/100 (14/100)
 : 

Back to top Go down

Re: More evidence against Clemens

Post by ItsOnlyGil on Fri Jul 04, 2008 9:22 am

"McNamee kept the items -- dating to 2000 or 2001 -- because he "had this inkling and gut feeling that he couldn't trust Roger and better keep something to protect himself in the future."

I'd slab this BS as an 8, if it wasn't recolored.

ItsOnlyGil
Legend
Legend

Posts : 786
Joined : 15 Dec 2007
Trader Points : 
2/1002/1002/1002/100 (2/100)
 : 

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum