Cracker Jack reprints

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Cracker Jack reprints

Post by sabrjay on Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:18 pm

Thin stock is always a good sign with CJs.

_________________
Jay

I like to sit outside, drink beer and yell at people. When I do this at home I get arrested, so I go to baseball games and fit right in.
avatar
sabrjay
Dunderhead
Dunderhead

Posts : 7784
Trader Points :
25 / 10025 / 100


View user profile http://fullcountforum.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Cracker Jack reprints

Post by jinks_1706 on Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:45 pm

Could the difference in the PSA scans be due to one is 1915 and the other 1914?

Are thier documented differences between the years? Just a question.

Thanks

jinks_1706
Minor Leaguer
Minor Leaguer

Posts : 7
Trader Points :
0 / 1000 / 100


View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Cracker Jack reprints

Post by sabrjay on Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:50 pm

The major differences are the back being oriented different, more cards in the 1915 set and a few pose changes like Mathewson. Other than that, no changes in printing style.

_________________
Jay

I like to sit outside, drink beer and yell at people. When I do this at home I get arrested, so I go to baseball games and fit right in.
avatar
sabrjay
Dunderhead
Dunderhead

Posts : 7784
Trader Points :
25 / 10025 / 100


View user profile http://fullcountforum.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Cracker Jack reprints

Post by fisherboy7 on Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:58 pm

Yup, adding to what Jay said, 1915 CJ's have upside down backs. 1914, right side up.

_________________

Ben
avatar
fisherboy7
Admin
Admin

Posts : 4280
Trader Points :
36 / 10036 / 100


View user profile http://www.imageevent.com/fisherboy7

Back to top Go down

Re: Cracker Jack reprints

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum